Le Québec Vote — lequebecvote.ca

Christine Fréchette

Coalition avenir Québec — September 9, 2026, Cinq chefs, une élection, Radio-Canada

Logo — Coalition avenir QuébecCoalition avenir Québec

Segment 00:02:23–00:26:46 of the full broadcast.

Watch on YouTube →
23
Questions or follow-ups analyzed
16
Direct responses
6
Partial responses
1
No identifiable answer
3
Diversions noted

Analysis

Christine Fréchette answers directly to the majority of questions asked (16 of 23), with six partial responses and only one without an identifiable position.

The interview covers jobs threatened by the US tariff war, the record of eight years of CAQ government, access to health care (the digital health file, surgery wait lists), home support for seniors, openness to publicly funded private care in health, energy (natural gas, the Churchill Falls project) and homelessness.

On several issues — the number of jobs exposed to US tariffs, Quebec's room to maneuver should Ottawa cross its red lines, whether the billion dollars announced for home support is sufficient — an intention or position is identifiable without its scale or mechanism being fully demonstrated. The only response classified as without an identifiable position concerns the blocking power of Innu communities opposed to the Churchill Falls project.

Two figures cited were subject to a separate fact check, presented below: the rise in real GDP per capita since 2018, and the drop in surgery wait lists of more than a year.

What he/she was asked

Direct: the requested position or information is identifiable. Partial: an essential part receives a response, but a central element remains unanswered. No identifiable answer: no requested position or information can be identified. A diversion is not automatically a non-answer.

  • How many Quebec jobs are at stake in the tariff war?

    Duration is decisive; cites 450 jobs in Témiscamingue and 35 in Drummondville, without a Quebec-wide total.

    Partial
  • Does talking about a "first mandate" serve to erase eight years of CAQ government?

    Defends several accomplishments, then distinguishes her style, her generation, and her priorities.

    Direct
  • What is their leverage with Ottawa?

    Invokes two red lines: supply management and language/culture; says Carney has respected them.

    Direct
  • Why believe their health care promises after eight years in power?

    Acknowledges the delays and points to the digital health record and medical agreements, but shows little of the link to concrete access.

    Direct
  • Will the digital health record lead to more appointments?

    Cites 600,000 registrations, more appointments, and the drop in the surgery wait list of over a year.

    Direct
  • What would she do if Carney crossed her red lines?

    Mainly replies that she believes he will keep his word; no specific means of retaliation is given.

    Partial
  • Under what conditions would she use electricity as leverage?

    Refers to a hypothetical escalation and contractual constraints, and does not rule out acting outside contracts, without a precise threshold.

    Partial
  • What is their flagship measure on the cost of living?

    Names the conversion of 5,000 subsidized daycare spaces and 2,000 affordable housing units for seniors.

    Direct
  • Will seniors really get more support after the reduction in hours?

    Promises one million additional hours and explains the expected effect on the network.

    Direct
  • Is one billion dollars enough to make up for the shortfall in home care?

    Says it is a step forward and that it will be necessary to see how things develop on the ground, without demonstrating sufficiency.

    Partial
  • Do the empty rooms in seniors' homes symbolize a CAQ failure?

    Shifts the answer toward the national labour shortage and training efforts.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    Partial
  • Does her openness to private care contradict her government's front-line care policy?

    Sets a public wait-time condition and provides for publicly funded private care when the wait is too long.

    Direct
  • Would she change the law to allow Quebec natural gas?

    Starts with Churchill Falls, then conditionally opens the door if environmental standards and social acceptability are respected.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    Direct
  • How would she measure social acceptability?

    Through polls and depending on the region, citing wind power projects.

    Direct
  • Is she in favour of the gas terminal planned for Baie-Comeau?

    Declines to take a position before a complete project is tabled. The position is identifiable and justified.

    Direct
  • Could Innu opposition derail Churchill Falls?

    States she wants to discuss and touts the energy potential, without answering on veto power or the consent requirement.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    No identifiable answer
  • Which party is she the leader of?

    "Équipe Christine Fréchette — Coalition Avenir Québec."

    Direct
  • Why doesn't "Coalition Avenir Québec" appear on the campaign signs?

    Refers to a renewed image without clearly explaining the branding decision.

    Direct
  • Can she name three good moves by François Legault?

    Names Churchill Falls, specialized courts, and school construction/renovation.

    Direct
  • Is she in favour of an annual homelessness count?

    Yes; considers it important to track the figures and how things evolve.

    Direct
  • Will she make zero homelessness a goal?

    Says it is her wish and speaks of a national plan, without a firm target or timeline.

    Partial
  • What measure from an opponent inspires them?

    Cites Ruba Ghazal's commitment on homelessness and expresses a wish to collaborate.

    Direct
  • Why reject a $20 minimum wage?

    Replies that this would affect the entire pay scale and would be a hard blow.

    Direct

Fact checks

Fact check

Quebec's real GDP per capita has grown by 5% since the CAQ took office, a better rate than Ontario and the rest of Canada.

Verdict: Broadly accurate on the figure, though period and causation need clarification

Data from Quebec's Ministry of Finance show that real GDP per capita rose from $51,299 in 2018 to $53,812 in 2024, in chained 2017 dollars — an increase of 4.9%, rounded to about 5%.

YearReal GDP per capita
2018$51,299
2020$49,286
2022$54,495
2024$53,812

Over the same period (2018-2024), the same document puts Ontario's change at −0.3% and the rest of Canada's at −0.9%: the comparison favourable to Quebec is supported by the figures cited.

Key nuances. The comparison chooses 2018 as its starting point — it measures a change under the CAQ mandate, without demonstrating that the increase stems entirely from its policies (the economic cycle, the pandemic, demographics, private investment and the international climate also play a role). The increase was not continuous: the indicator declined in 2023 and 2024. Finally, GDP per capita measures average economic output, not disposable income, purchasing power or the cost of housing.

Quebec's real GDP per capita rose by about 4.9% between 2018 and 2024, compared to declines in Ontario and the rest of Canada according to the Ministry of Finance. This growth was not continuous, however: the indicator fell in 2023 and 2024. The comparison describes a change under the CAQ, without demonstrating that it stems entirely from its policies.

Fact check

The list of people waiting for surgery for more than a year fell from about 10,000 a year earlier to under 4,000.

Verdict: The current level is accurate, the year-over-year comparison is not

The last official count available before the interview recorded 3,822 surgery requests pending for more than a year (period from June 28 to July 25, 2026): the "under 4,000" threshold is confirmed.

For a comparable period one year earlier, however, the total was 6,290, not about 10,000. The network counted close to 10,000 such requests — 10,017 precisely — in fall 2024, nearly two years before the interview.

Financial periodApproximate periodPending for more than a year
2024-2025 P08fall 202410,017
2025-2026 P04summer 20256,290
2026-2027 P04June 28 to July 25, 20263,822

Key nuances. The downward trend is real and significant regardless of which time reference is used. The cleanest comparison sets comparable periods against each other (P04 to P04): 6,290 to 3,822, a 39% drop. A wait list is a snapshot at the end of each period, not a continuous measure, and the file only partially covers cardiac surgery. This decline documents the longest waits, not overall access to surgery.

The last official count available before the interview recorded 3,822 surgery requests pending for more than a year: the "under 4,000" threshold is accurate. However, the comparable total one year earlier was 6,290, not about 10,000. The network counted close to 10,000 such requests in fall 2024.

Explore this interview in the campaign data

Search the statements from this interview · See the questions asked

Methodology and sources

Based on the full video and official captions from Radio-Canada. Each response's status follows a constant rule: an identifiable position remains a direct response even if its cost, timeline or mechanism is not yet demonstrated; a response is classified as without an identifiable position only when no requested information can be identified. See our methodology.