Le Québec Vote — lequebecvote.ca

Ruba Ghazal

Québec solidaire — September 9, 2026, Cinq chefs, une élection, Radio-Canada

Logo — Québec solidaireQuébec solidaire

Segment 00:50:27–01:13:54 of the full broadcast.

Watch on YouTube →
20
Questions or follow-ups analyzed
11
Direct responses
4
Partial responses
5
No identifiable answer
4
Diversions noted

Analysis

Ruba Ghazal answers directly to 11 of 20 questions or follow-ups, with four partial responses and five without an identifiable position.

The interview addresses Québec solidaire's electoral prospects, immigration (a target of 70,000, capacity to receive), a tax on large fortunes, QS's role in the event of a minority Parti Québécois government and a referendum, the size of the state, rent control, and a $20 minimum wage.

The five responses without an identifiable position concern the criterion that would constitute an electoral failure, the gap between the party's proposals and voting intentions, and — on two separate occasions — the parliamentary conditions for QS support of a minority government or a referendum. These questions receive answers about sovereigntist mobilization or campaign priorities, but not the precise institutional conditions asked about.

The tax on large fortunes — the target of 4,000 households and the projected yield of $5 billion per year — was subject to a separate fact check, presented below.

What he/she was asked

Direct: the requested position or information is identifiable. Partial: an essential part receives a response, but a central element remains unanswered. No identifiable answer: no requested position or information can be identified. A diversion is not automatically a non-answer.

  • Why vote QS if its chances of governing are slim?

    Says she is aiming for a majority government and presents the vote as a choice of solutions rather than probabilities.

    Direct
  • What does she say to voters afraid of "wasting" their vote?

    Asks that the proposals be judged rather than the polls and states that QS can govern.

    Direct
  • Would fewer seats than in 2022 be a failure?

    Reaffirms wanting the largest possible number of seats, without answering the failure criterion.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    No identifiable answer
  • Does she think she can increase her number of seats?

    Yes, that is her objective, while noting that voters decide.

    Direct
  • Why don't her reforms translate into support?

    Lists proposals she considers popular, without clearly explaining the gap with voting intentions.

    No identifiable answer
  • Does a target of 70,000 exceed reception capacity?

    Confirms the target and stresses the benefits of immigration; housing and service constraints are barely quantified.

    Partial
  • How to absorb the pressure on housing and services?

    Proposes French-language training and a regional PEQ, but mainly addresses integration and little about material capacity.

    Partial
  • What would stop large fortunes from leaving Quebec?

    Invokes the Spanish and Norwegian experience, attachment to Quebec, and its economic benefits.

    Direct
  • What does "4,000 households" worth more than $25 million mean?

    Replies that it is the tax definition of a household, one or two people/a family.

    Direct
  • Would QS help a minority PQ government call a referendum?

    First replies that the population needs to be rallied, without committing to support.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    No identifiable answer
  • Would its support be conditional on QS's demands?

    Says the discussions will happen later and that QS will be in the Yes camp.

    Partial
  • Would a premier elected with 30% have the legitimacy to call the referendum?

    Speaks of a social coalition and mobilization, without answering on institutional legitimacy.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    No identifiable answer
  • Does she refuse to shrink the state because everything is going well?

    No; acknowledges that improvements are needed but rejects cuts that would affect services.

    Direct
  • How to preserve the Quebec model?

    Through tax reform and a wealth tax rather than austerity.

    Direct
  • What requirement would she set to support a minority government?

    Says she will think about it when the time comes and returns to her campaign priorities.

    Shift to another topic noted in the research.

    No identifiable answer
  • Does rent control risk reducing construction and maintenance?

    Disputes the causal link, cites current increases, and adds a plan to increase the supply of affordable housing.

    Direct
  • What does the mayor of New York inspire in her?

    A political inspiration focused on ordinary people and concrete solutions.

    Direct
  • Are their teams in contact with hers?

    Not officially, to her knowledge; she is following his proposals and mentions possible contacts within his circle.

    Direct
  • Why does a $20 minimum wage raise concern?

    Defends a living income and announces $300 million in declining assistance; explains the remedy more than the source of the concerns.

    Partial
  • What measure from an opponent inspires them?

    Cites CAQ funding for shelters for women who are victims of violence.

    Direct

Fact checks

Fact check

A tax on net fortunes above $25 million would affect about 4,000 Quebec households and generate $5 billion per year.

Verdict: Commitment confirmed, projected yield not publicly demonstrated

Québec solidaire's platform states that about 4,000 households have net wealth above $25 million. The party's financial framework records a yield of $4.51 billion in 2027-2028, rising to $5 billion in 2030-2031 — not from the first year.

Fiscal yearProjected revenue
2027-2028$4.510 billion
2028-2029$4.670 billion
2029-2030$4.830 billion
2030-2031$5.000 billion

The public documents consulted provide neither the wealth distribution used, nor a complete tax schedule, nor the valuation, avoidance or migration assumptions needed to independently reproduce these results.

Key nuances. The wealthiest households are rare and poorly measured by ordinary surveys — Statistics Canada acknowledges having to adjust the distribution at the top. Knowing that 4,000 households exceed a threshold does not reveal their total wealth above that threshold, which nonetheless determines the yield. A comparable federal analysis (a 1% tax above $20 million, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer) confirms that such a tax can generate several billion dollars at the Canadian scale, without validating Quebec's calculation: jurisdiction, rate, year and tax base differ.

Québec solidaire states that a tax on fortunes above $25 million would affect 4,000 households. Its financial framework projects $4.51 billion in revenue in 2027-2028, then $5 billion in 2030-2031. The public documents, however, do not provide the wealth distribution, the detailed tax schedule or the assumptions needed to reproduce the calculation; the yield should therefore be presented as the party's projection, not as a verified amount.

Explore this interview in the campaign data

Search the statements from this interview · See the questions asked

Methodology and sources

Based on the full video and official captions from Radio-Canada. Each response's status follows a constant rule: an identifiable position remains a direct response even if its cost, timeline or mechanism is not yet demonstrated; a response is classified as without an identifiable position only when no requested information can be identified. See our methodology.